• AJ Sadauskas@aus.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    @Overthr0w @MrLee Ford’s revenues for the first quarter of 2023 were US$41.5 billion.

    The big auto companies have more than enough resources to set up their own instances, if they so wish.

    There’s no obligation on a privately-owned instance to host their accounts. He can moderate his instance how he wishes. He can allow who he likes on his instance.

    (Out of curiosity, did these car companies offer to pay any of his hosting costs?)

    If you don’t agree with his moderation decisions, you don’t have to use his instance, or use an instance that federates with his.

    As for free speech, I don’t see any government action or any legislation that compels this decision.

    • Overthr0w@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just think, that excluding specific people that have not actually done anything wrong yet(at least on this platform) will lead to a homogeneous userbase. And even if he is not obliged to host anyone, I think it would be a way smarter decision if someone, who is aware of their danger, is hosting them. That person could later moderate their usage of their accounts, if they overstep certain limits way sooner than someone hosting them on another instance.