I just can’t, and sadly it’s worst in Linux community. Like dude’s face hair makes him look 45, but no, he does a desktop with a cringy looking 15 old anime girl. (That, on top of hiz annoyingly high pitched voice but whatever) I just stop watching the video on the spot, it’s beyond dumb.

The stupid NSFW tag on Lemmy? I turned it ON to occasionally see boobs, not some drawn pictures of underage kiddo, this pisses me off so much, JUST FCKING STAHP with this shit.

I have an impression suddenly, in a span of 2 years everyone started to jerk off on that bullshit and are proud to show it

  • Fal@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some are drawn to look like little kids, sure. But even still, it’s a drawing and doesn’t necessarily correlate to real life attraction to kids. Same way as I mentioned earlier watching gay hentai, or even gay porn, doesn’t mean you’re gay or even attracted to men in real life at all. Same way you can watch violent movies or play violent games and enjoy the fantasy without having any interest at all in real life.

    So sure, I’ll bet there’s lots of pedos that watch loli stuff. But at the end of the day, who cares? They’re either going to watch that, or go find real kids. And lumping everyone who has a fantasy as being a pedophile just makes the conversation impossible and does nothing to protect or defend anyone

    • RaivoKulli
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the sexual fantasy that makes one pedo was the whole point.

      • Fal@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But it’s a fantasy involving a drawing that could represent anything. If they’re not actually attracted to real kids, they’re not a pedophile.

        • RaivoKulli
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It could represent anything but what is it representing in this specific case? Yeah.

          • Fal@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, for a lot of people it’s not actual kids. So I don’t know what to tell you

              • Fal@yiffit.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The same thing furries represent. Just characters, that don’t necessarily have an age, or gender, or species. It’s the abstract representation of something you can project onto for various fantasies. Maybe they like that they’re small, or cute, but don’t necessarily relate it to a real life kid. When I look at furry stuff I’m not thinking about it in terms of real animals. They’re completely different and they only bear a superficial resemblance to animals, just like an anime character only bears a superficial resemblance to a human.

                • RaivoKulli
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What separates those specific characters from your regular anime characters?

                  • Fal@yiffit.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Again, nothing, that’s my point, they’re all friggen drawings, and don’t necessarily correlate to anything real. This whole argument is about assigning an arbitrary number to a drawing. And unless you’re going to tell me that liking yiff makes you into bestiality, you understand my point and can stop asking questions.