• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who gives a shit. If he broke the law, convict him, as long as it’s consistent with anyone not the son of a famous politician. By the same token, these same rich and powerful people have to be accountable to all of same laws…

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      as long as it’s consistent with anyone not the son of a famous politician

      As the article notes, it is not consistent, and the charges were likely brought due to political pressure.

      Your average addict would have these charges dropped and a diversionary program offered, as was in the initial plea deal (prior to political pressure being leveraged).

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well then, I oppose it. But not because I’m part of some cult-of-personality about the man… That would just be pathetic!

      • HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought the people bringing the charges are the ones against all the regulations and background checks on firearms to begin with. So all of a sudden they’re just changing their minds, as a party, on an issue that’s one of the foundations of their entire platform. Yeah, no one is going to see right through that giant pile of hypocritical bullshit.