tst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIntel announces Thunderbolt 5 with double the bandwidth (40 Gbps to 80 Gbps)www.macworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1347arrow-down15cross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
arrow-up1342arrow-down1external-linkIntel announces Thunderbolt 5 with double the bandwidth (40 Gbps to 80 Gbps)www.macworld.comtst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
minus-squareMooseBoys@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down4·edit-21 year agoCan we just switch to fiber interfaces already? TB5 apparently has a one-meter maximum passive cable length, compared to TB4’s already short two meters.
minus-squarekalleboo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·1 year agoThunderbolt optical cables exist if you need them, and for anyone who doesn’t the extra cost of the optical interface is a waste.
minus-squareDfy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 year agoBut then you would need fiber glass cables, put it in your bag/pockets by itself and you have to buy another one
minus-squarestevehobbes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoYou still need copper unless you don’t want to transmit power too. Interestingly, fiber technically has more latency than copper - light moves slower through fiber than electrons through copper.
Can we just switch to fiber interfaces already? TB5 apparently has a one-meter maximum passive cable length, compared to TB4’s already short two meters.
Thunderbolt optical cables exist if you need them, and for anyone who doesn’t the extra cost of the optical interface is a waste.
But then you would need fiber glass cables, put it in your bag/pockets by itself and you have to buy another one
You still need copper unless you don’t want to transmit power too.
Interestingly, fiber technically has more latency than copper - light moves slower through fiber than electrons through copper.