tst123@lemmy.world to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoTIL that John Lennon's son had to buy back postcards sent to him by his father from his widow Yoko Onowww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1584arrow-down119
arrow-up1565arrow-down1external-linkTIL that John Lennon's son had to buy back postcards sent to him by his father from his widow Yoko Onowww.youtube.comtst123@lemmy.world to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square102fedilink
minus-squarefoggianism@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down1·1 year agoAustralians wouldn’t agree with you on your stance on Yoko. She’s too bad of a person.
minus-squarebillwashere@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoFrom what I’ve seen I envy Australians on their creative uses of that word. But it’s seems as if it’s usually not really a derogatory term there.
minus-squareephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoIt’s both. The way the first commenter used it was unambiguously “they’re a fucking shit person”. There has to be a qualifier for it to be positive.
minus-squareOscarRobin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoDepends on how it’s said and any adjectives.
Australians wouldn’t agree with you on your stance on Yoko. She’s too bad of a person.
From what I’ve seen I envy Australians on their creative uses of that word.
But it’s seems as if it’s usually not really a derogatory term there.
It’s both. The way the first commenter used it was unambiguously “they’re a fucking shit person”. There has to be a qualifier for it to be positive.
“He’s a good cunt”
Vs. She’s a right cunt
Depends on how it’s said and any adjectives.