• Kalash@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Low-density sprawl essentially requires cars.

    I disagree. I live in the suburbs in Europe and there is plenty of single family homes with a garden here. But you’re still always within 500m of a bus stop or tramline. Have been living here without a car for quite while, it’s fine.

    • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d be curious what the population density numbers are. There’s a world of difference in density between, say, single-family rowhouses and classic American suburbia.

      • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My math is here: https://lemmy.world/comment/3165486

        But essentially, for the same cost as cars, the lowest density possible before becoming rural 106 households / sq mi (6 acres per household) can have a bus pass every 6 minutes, 24/7/365. You can double frequency by adding a second stop on the way to a transit spine.

        • DreamButt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          The idea that an American city might have a housing area A) without roads and B) with a bus stop and C) one that shows up every 6 minutes instead of once an hour makes me want to cry

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I think it’s mostly rowhouses.

        Also the entire suburb spreads along through a valley, so it’s like long and thin, which makes it very easy to run a central tramline through it.

        But it still should be possible anywhere with good public transport.

        • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah, there’s your answer. I love rowhouses and think they and other “missing middle” are a great compromise for getting denser, more walkable, more transit-oriented communities while still avoiding being like Manhattan. True low-density sprawl (as seen in so much of the US and Canada) is detached single-family homes with large setback requirements, large parking minimums, and typically large lot size minimums. It’s purposefully designed to essentially enforce car-dependent sprawl.

          The style of development you describe is what we call streetcar suburbs, as they were generally developed along streetcar lines in the days of yore.

          • Kalash@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The style of development you describe is what we call streetcar suburbs, as they were generally developed along streetcar lines in the days of yore.

            Yeah, you need to build these, they are great. During the busy hours, mine is like a 150m walk away and there is tram or streetcar every 3.5 minutes. It’s amazing.