• qyron
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All the criticism put towards the technology could be as easily applied to the internal combustion engine: its inefficient, produces larges amounts of residues and is expensive to run.

    This was an attempt at being sarcastic.

    If we’re running a technology by all means obsolete (internal combustion engine) and do it overlooking its drawbacks running current technology for dessalination can very well follow the same reasoning.

    I read a good deal of criticism towards dessalination regarding the disposal of the brine. That is a fair point but those brines could very well be reprocessed for minerals harvesting including lithium, which has great demand. Even by just harvesting the salt, we’d be getting an important resource.

    There is, of course, the problem of distribution but we’ve already invented pipelines, haven’t we?

    This is true and we already do it. Fresh water is distributed over huge distances using high pressure and volume. The infrastructure already exists.

    And a water pipeline bursting could cause floods but no great concern lasting environmental damage, unlike oil or liquified natural gas.

    I’ve lived where this happened once and it was not pretty. A low point of high density residencial area got flooded. Water reached somewhere around 80cm high. Damage to cars and ground stories, water distribution interrupted for 3 days. But no lasting damage.