• Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry, I failed to relay my point. When somebody writes over x amount - it’s always a rounded number. This smells of either pre-highschool levels of language or some ML generated content.

    • severien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      The author of the blogpost is a developer, not a professional writer. Honestly I don’t understand why you’re so upset about it.

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m upset about it because it lacks attention to detail. Language is tricky, but this is an attempt to use an expression without understanding what it is. The obvious choice would’ve been to not use it and state the numbers plainly.

        • Tamo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Perhaps the numbers are not plainly available as the previous commenter stated, and they wanted to call out the direct contribution of the 78 unique commit authors, without disregarding many other indirect contributions from commenters, reviewers, testers etc.

        • Marzepansion@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s perhaps better that patch notes are written by programmers and not linguists. Incorrectly using a (harmless) phrase is perfectly okay. It doesn’t detract from the important bits of the announcement at all.

          edit: damn, that’s a big reaction for an accidental mistake someone wrote in a patch notes highlight article.

        • severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The obvious choice would’ve been to not use it and state the numbers plainly.

          How would you write it?

          • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            The open source Git project just released Git 2.42 with features and bug fixes from 78 contributors, 17 of them new.

            There. Simple.

            • severien@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              But there were more contributors, you just don’t know how many. By this you’re kind of disregarding their work.

              • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                No there aren’t, stop making things up. From the official release notes:

                The latest feature release Git v2.42.0 is now available at the
                usual places.  It is comprised of 453 non-merge commits since
                v2.41.0, contributed by 78 people, 17 of which are new faces
                
                • severien@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  78 people contributed in the form of code commits, but more people likely contributed to the release in other ways (QA, triage, release management etc.)

                  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    12
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Fuck me. Can you not read? It is stating specifically features and bug fixes. QA, triage, release management are neither features nor bug fixes. They’re processes. They’re necessary. But that’s a separate thing.

    • Sibbo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Usually, also people who write in issues or discuss things are counted as contributors, but there it is pretty hard to figure out who contributed to this specific release