An overwhelming majority of what we eat is made from plants and animals. This means that composition of our almost entire food is chemicals from the realm of organic chemistry (carbon-based large molecules). Water and salt are two prominent examples of non-organic foodstuffs - which come from the realm of inorganic chemistry. Beside some medicines is there any more non-organic foods? Can we eat rocks, salts, metals, oxides… and I just don’t know that?

  • Radio_717@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Calcium carbonate is inorganic because it doesn’t contain hydrogen. Organic compound must have both carbon and hydrogen atoms.

    Edit- more specifically the hydrogen and carbon should be covalently bonded and there are still a few exceptions as noted by other comments below.

    • Beardliest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a false statement. It needs to have carbon-hydrogen non-ionic bonds for it to be organic. Think carbonic acid vs a ketone of some sort.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Calcium carbonate is inorganic because it is a simple salt. Containing hydrogen has nothing to do with it. Ca(HCO3)2 is just as inorganic.

      If you think a molecule needs to contain both H and C to be organic, then fully halogenated propane is inorganic, but as soon as one of the 8 halogen atoms is not substituted it suddenly is organic again. This gets even more absurd with larger molecules like oleic acid C18H34O2. 34 chlorine replacing all H? Inorganic. 33? Organic.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Organic compounds don’t have a strict consensus based definition today. So any matter of fact statement isn’t widely held any longer. It’s just one school of thought so to speak.

      • Radio_717@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right- primarily because science changes as new things are discovered and therefore the definition changes.

        I still think the definition I learned with C-H covalent bonds indicating organic has fewer exceptions than other definitions.