• AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Churchill argued at length that Russia had to be next after Germany fell. He probably was onto something there.

    • NathanielThomas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think a direct war with the Soviet Union after meeting in Germany would have been possible but at that point probably too costly. All out war with Britain, France and USA versus the Soviet Union could potentially have defeated the Red Army but at a staggering loss of human life. As well, the ground they had to cover to push back to Moscow at that point would have been outlandishly difficult.

      Instead, the American support of Russia was a bit too successful and should only have supported a stalemate in the Eastern front until attrition made both very weak. Then, after D-Day, the Allies could have liberated Poland, Hungary, Romania, Estonia, etc. And then Russia would have been in 1945 where they are today instead of having 50+ years of occupation.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, the popularity of the Communist Parties in Europe at the time would probably have made such a confrontation quite awkward.