PeterPoopshit@sh.itjust.works to > Greentext@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoAnon gets his iPhone battery replacedsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up11.37Karrow-down142
arrow-up11.33Karrow-down1imageAnon gets his iPhone battery replacedsh.itjust.worksPeterPoopshit@sh.itjust.works to > Greentext@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square137fedilink
minus-squareAdo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoWhy is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless
minus-squarekamen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).
minus-squareZiemekZ@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSamsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.
minus-squarekamen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoOne of the very few phones like this.
Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless
“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).
deleted by creator
Samsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.
One of the very few phones like this.