Donald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoTrump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down118cross-posted to: conservative@lemmyusa.comconservative@lemmy.today
arrow-up147arrow-down1external-linkTrump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comDonald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: conservative@lemmyusa.comconservative@lemmy.today
minus-squarewhodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·1 day agoLiterally how? He’s never seen a single consequence that mattered.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down7·1 day agoIf we take it logical extreme, he might as well be asking for a lawless country.
minus-squareSwordgeek@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up28·1 day agoMaybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies. He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·1 day agoI know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
minus-squaremiss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 day agoLemmy demands an “/s”.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-21 day agoOkay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoBecause the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.
Literally how? He’s never seen a single consequence that mattered.
If we take it logical extreme, he might as well be asking for a lawless country.
Maybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies.
He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
I know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
Lemmy demands an “/s”.
Okay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
Because the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.