Donald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 天前Trump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down118cross-posted to: conservative@lemmyusa.comconservative@lemmy.today
arrow-up147arrow-down1external-linkTrump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comDonald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 天前message-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: conservative@lemmyusa.comconservative@lemmy.today
minus-squarewhodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·1 天前Literally how? He’s never seen a single consequence that mattered.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down7·1 天前If we take it logical extreme, he might as well be asking for a lawless country.
minus-squareSwordgeek@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up28·1 天前Maybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies. He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·1 天前I know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
minus-squaremiss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 天前Lemmy demands an “/s”.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-21 天前Okay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 天前Because the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.
Literally how? He’s never seen a single consequence that mattered.
If we take it logical extreme, he might as well be asking for a lawless country.
Maybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies.
He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
I know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
Lemmy demands an “/s”.
Okay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
Because the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.