Ex-Linus Tech Tips employee alleges mistreatment and poor conditions: “no one gets a break” - Dexerto::undefined

  • TBi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    173
    ·
    1 year ago

    I replied this in another thread. Which was downvoted…

    It really feels like the pitchforks are out. People want blood and don’t care if the allegations are true or not.

    Probably mistakes were made, hopefully just innocent mistakes or bad communication. But it really feels like people don’t care. They see LTT doing well and want to tear them down, even if bringing LTT down will be bad for everyone.

    I’ve had a disgruntled employee before. Their version of events was very different to how the rest of the team saw it. If something innocent could have been taken badly it was. I’m not saying that happened here. But let’s investigate and presume innocence.

      • blabber6285
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        He did say “HOPEFULLY just innocent mistakes…” Which we all should hope whether we think all allegations are true or not.

    • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      When was the last time you accidentally told someone at work to calm their tits and twerk for you, and in what psychotic universe is that innocent

      • TerribleTuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Okay, I wanna say that you’re right. It’s never an okay and cool thing to say to an employee that is working for you. However, let me give you some of my perspective, because I can easily see how stuff like this can happen by accident or “innocently”.

        I’m socially retarded, I might even have a tad bit of autism. Social ques for me are just hard and sometimes takes a while for me to figure out. It’s like a science at times.

        So I think “Calm your tits” is an expression used for basically “Calm down”, “Don’t get too excited” or “Take it easy”. And I can easily see two close friends taking this expression a step further and adding “Calm your tits and twerk for me!” as a fun way to say “Don’t get too exited but get exited”

        Now I could easily see a younger me stumbling upon two dudes having this social interaction and hearing this new fun expression and wanting to try it out myself without thinking of how or to who I’m saying it to. So yeah, I could see shit like this happen by accident and without malicious intent.

        I’m a grown up. I realize that the things I say and how I say it have consequences. The things I say to my friends might not always translate well into a work environment social setting.

        So could this happen? Yes (at least I think so)
        Should this happen? No.

        If you’re a businessowner you have (for lack of a better word) “power” over your employees and you can’t go around using expressions like these in a professional setting.

        Sorry for the long reply, I agree with you, just wanted to add some perspective! Have a good day! <3

        • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ok I had to walk away and come back to this because this is horrifying.

          You don’t “have a tad bit of autism.” You’re excusing your own bad behaviour because you’re anti-social and lazy, and implying that autistic people are bigots.

          You claim to be a grown up, and you think “calm your tits” is a “fun way” to express something. In a workplace. To a woman. There is literally no excuse for this.

          You are part of the problem, and your reaction is to claim autism and make excuses.

    • stratoscaster@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bro that woman is getting death threats I kinda doubt she’d be lying just to be vindictive

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Knowing what women go through silently and how much more they go though when they try to speak up… Yeah… Nobody would volunteer to be harassed by women-hating techbros unless they had a very compelling reason.

    • Devccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can assure you, this is not about people wanting to take down the 15M subscriber titan. (though undoubtedly some haters are just jumping on the opportunity, I don’t think that’s the majority) For many of us fans, we have been seeing this coming for a while, or those who are blindsided feel utterly betrayed after such a long time watching LTT religiously. It’s always been possible to ignore the awkward moments in videos or write off the bad behavior as just an “on-screen persona” thing. There’s a clear problem with company culture at LTT, and these things usually come out in this way, with victims waiting for the right moment. Presuming innocence on his part means presuming lies on the part of the victims, and that doesn’t sit right with me. I wouldn’t necessarily take it 100% at face value truth but there’s no doubt something majorly wrong going on in that office.

      As a fan, I want to see transparency and a healthy working environment behind the videos. Linus’ response wasn’t just underwhelming, it was a complete betrayal. Even before I knew about the nasty working conditions, the simple back and forth between GN and Linus was enough to put a massive crack in the LTT facade. I didn’t need someone to confirm the working conditions were bad, to make an educated guess at how the guy totally unwilling to spend “up to” $500 man-hours more on a video to ensure it’s done right probably isn’t running a fair system of work.

    • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You lost me when you claimed that a low quality youtube channel going down would be somehow bad for me.

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think they made the correct call to hire a third-party to investigate this. A lot of things that are happening is LMG not treating themselves like a real company, rather a group of friends with a YouTube channel.

      There’s been a lot of incompetence and mistakes that happened because of the company’s grindset, but they’re not evil. They made some serious fuck-ups, and need to take major action to remedy them. I feel like a lot of people don’t want to see these issues fixed, they just want to pull out the pitchforks.

      • shottymcb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tech news is a saturated field. It’s no great loss if this sack of dicks gets thrown in the river.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think when a company like this egregiously breaches our trust, damages other entities, and then stubbornly doubles down on the same, it is not only understandable but entirely rational to be far less willing to give them the benefit of the doubt when new allegations arise.

      But as always I, and hopefully everyone here, will update their point of view as new evidence arises.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I got downvoted for my shitty opinion before, but I’m incapable of introspection, so I’m just going to keep saying my shitty opinions over and over again until someone tells me I’m right”

      • TDCN@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is not really constructive information. You are being childish here. If you have something meaningful to add to the conversation just say it instead of being mocking.

    • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t matter about the downvotes. These are the type of people who were frothing at the mouth back when Reddit detective “found” the Boston bomber (they didn’t actually and them jumping to conclusions made the situation worse)

      The allegations are appalling, but that’s all they are, allegations.

      LMG definitely needs to come out with a statement about her claims but until then it might be worth reminding yourself that you don’t know the full story.

    • _danny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I do think a healthy amount of scepticism is healthy here. Her accusations are worded very carefully to not directly target anyone in particular and there is no proof of her accusations nor any way for LMG to dispute her claims because of how they are worded. Regardless of the timing. It’s all a little too convenient.

      That said, scepticism doesn’t mean blind faith in LMG, and it doesn’t mean tearing down the accuser. The new CEO getting an independent investigation is the best thing possible and we should hold our judgement until the result of that investigation.

      Edit: made my point regarding the timing more clear.

      I’m glad to see lemmy so active, even if it is negatively against my comment

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not to even mention the timing. It’s all a little too convenient.

        The “timing” is “while everybody is discussing the issues within LTT”. That’s a completely reasonable time for an ex-employee to contribute their views.

        If you’re presenting “how conversations work” as suspicious, I don’t think that skepticism is healthy at all.

        • _danny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not to play semantics like the insanely bad take from Linus, but this isn’t just a conversation, her accusations are serious.

          I was clearly being unclear, the timing isn’t important here. The me too movement showed that a lot of people who faced some of the same things she did stayed quiet for years.

          • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What point were you wanting people to take away from your comment? Because it seems like it’s supposed to be “people with preferred pronouns can’t be trusted and will just make up stories about sexual assault”.

          • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wait. You are generalizing her as negative because she prefers to be called they? Lol human beings a fucking idiots.

      • Xavier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In that case, what would you consider to be a suitable “timing” then?

        Is it just after a victim (children/teenagers/men/women/anyone) was verbally/physically assaulted? Within an hour? Within 24/48/72 hours? A week? A month? A year?

        When is the appropriate inconvenient (in contrast to your “too convenient”) time for you?

        Whether the victim feels safe or not, ready or not, supported or not, free of any retaliation or not, when is it too late for a victim to speak out or tell their story? Is 2 years already too much? How about 5 years, 10 years or 20 years?

        • _danny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was being unclear about my opinion on the timing. I meant to say take the timing out of the equation all together.

          But yes, as a relative of someone who has been assaulted and sexually assaulted, my opinion is speak out loudly and immediately when faced with this kind of stuff. Every minute you waste speaking out is another minute the assaulter roams free. I get that some may be uncomfortable with that, and they should speak out as soon as they are emotionally able to.