• 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    One time, one of my coworkers showed up to work with his kid, because the babysitter called in sick. My manager, without skipping a beat, told him to go home and be the best dad he possibly could, then, not only did she not use his sick time for this day, she made it a department policy to allow unlimited* “parent days”. One of the best managers I’ve ever had.

    ’ * Fine print was basically, don’t abuse it, but use it when you need it.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Lol!! Parents day actually extended to pets, too, and later (about a year or so before I left) also extended to (what is now known as) mental health day.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If you don’t have young kids, you don’t get sick nearly as often. It’s not like having a sick kid at home is a vacation. I don’t begrudge my coworkers their time off for illness or supporting family members with illness.

        • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Thanks for telling me when I’m allowed to get sick. I’m sick of breeders acting like martyrs for deciding to have kids. You knew what your hobby entailed before you chose to participate.

          • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Here’s the thing then: nut up and demand it. The reason that employers cave to parents on these things is because they know the child will take priority and the parent will take that time regardless. As they should. Trying to tell half of the workforce that they need to prioritize the job over their children is not a battle you can win.

            If you have a problem with that then you need to find an ultimatum that you’re willing to stand your ground on. Otherwise just quit bitching because someone else received a benefit that you didn’t.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I mean not really if you want someone to operate on your heart you are old or someone to bring your groceries or drive you around etc

          • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            you also need people to make kids who will be around to carry out these services when we are old farts. but also money yes.

              • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I am not saying humanity will collapse. I am saying that your taxes paying for the upbringing of the new generation is so that the society does not collapse. Could there be other ways? Maybe, but still does not mean a kidless person paying taxes for education is unfair. That is called the social contract.