• lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I mean, you see the English translation in that video, if you watched it… It’s clearly not what you wrote there… You are obviously overexaggerating. She says “can lose their civilian status” and “because terrorists abuse that”, which requires them doing it. And before, she said, that “hiding behind schools leads us into difficult territory”.

    BTW: The video description does not quote here correctly. If I was you, I’d probably see this as bulletproof evidence that the news channel makes politics against one side…

    When Hamas terrorists hide behind people, behind schools… civilian places ((((the word “can” is very unfortunately missing here)))) lose their protected status because terrorists abuse it

    If you interpret this aggregation of conjunctives as “Israel is allowed to kill Palestinian civilians”, well… Please do us a favor and quote exactly what she says next time, instead of me having to look it up myself…

    I think, this does not make sense to continue… I’m sorry that you think that my country collectively hates Palestinians and that it’s impossible to protest for or against that kind of stuff and that this is some kind of repressive dictatorship. I already told you what I think about that.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      No you are use using extremist terrorist logic. And I am quite worried that you are so radicalised. You are currently on ISIS levels of extremism, I am not exaggerating.

      Let me help you understand how racist you are by swapping the subject and perpetrator:

      Every single location attacked by Hamas on oct7 had many IDF soldiers present. Was Hamas justified in killing unarmed Israeli civilians because the civilians were near soldiers?