Summary

In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court weakened the Clean Water Act by limiting the EPA’s authority to issue generic water quality standards.

The majority, led by Justice Alito, ruled that the EPA must impose specific pollutant limits instead of broad, “end result” requirements. The city of San Francisco prevailed, challenging the EPA’s narrative-based permits for sewage discharges.

Dissenters, led by Justice Barrett, argued the law authorizes stronger measures to protect water supplies.

The case marks the first significant Clean Water Act challenge since Chevron deference was overturned in 2024.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Great, so now asshole industrialists can pollute with whatever new-fangled chemicals they want, and if it’s not on the blacklist (good luck navigating the red tape to add to that list btw), they are free of liability and the public can get sick. Wonderful.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Oh look we changed the formula for Horrible Death Liquid tm by one molocule. Anyways we’ll just throw that in the reservoir behind the elementary school, what could go wrong?