‘If the circumstances are right, in 2028...I’ll do it,’ the former Democrat VP hopeful said

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

    • ColeD@lemm.eeEnglish
      5·
      5 hours ago

      I like adding AOC to the ticket. But getting through primaries may pit them against each other; their bases, at least.

      • Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
        4·
        4 hours ago

        I think it would actually be very easy to unite their bases. At a certain point we’re going to have to acknowledge that progressive populism is appealing to every demographic apart from evangelicals, xenophobes, and 3%ers. Midwesterners who like Walz may be more religious and worse LGBTQ+ allies, but fundamentally people want someone who is going to even the playing field for workers and that’s something that both groups would appreciate. A large amount of any campaign is going to have to be education about the benefits of unions, public projects, and being a member of your community rather than a shut-in if they want to generate positive buzz. Negative buzz is easy, just call the fascists weak and gross.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        3·
        5 hours ago

        That’s what the primaries are for. Selecting a candidate for your party to proceed with. The general election should set aside that division with the candidate having been chosen for the party already.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          1·
          4 hours ago

          The problem is, primaries are really good at selecting the worst candidate.

          See, the problem comes from something called candidate cloning.

          See, you might get more than 50% of the population supporting Tim Walz, or AOC.

          But when you force the people to choose between the two, well, now you have less than 50%.

          Add in a few more candidates with reasonable platforms and you can get the average support down to less than 10%.

          Then all you have to do is add in a candidate with a markedly different platform and 15% support can make them the winner of the primary.

          Ranked Choice cannot fix this problem, regardless of the claims made by proponents.

          The voting system that can fix things is Approval.

          Under Approval, you can vote for A, B, and C. The winner is the person with the highest overall approval.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          2·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, what we need is ranked choice same day primaries. Unfortunately that’s something that might land them the presidency so the democrats would never do it