I don’t understand how they are supposed to “sell your data” if you just never use a Mozilla account and uncheck all the telemetry. Its not like they can secretly steal your data, since its Open Source.

It seems to me like just more FUD that Google is spreading to undermine our trust in free software.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Mozilla just can’t stop taking Ls. This new and unnecessary development is another one.

    Putting a local LLM into a product that doesn’t need it, just like other businesses do, is just one step too far for me. I hate this AI trend with a passion.

    Good thing that Firefox is open source so that we can just switch forks.

    • dotslashme@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Putting a local LLM into a product that doesn’t need it, just like other businesses do, is just one step too far for me. I hate this AI trend with a passion.

      Seconded, the pushing AI trend is just off putting and is something that literally no-one asked for. It reminds me of that brief trend of 3D TVs.

        • nesc@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          There is no ai in ai, it’s just a program. In case of firefox translations it was made specifically for machine translation and later adapted to use with firefox browser.

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            There is no ai in ai, it’s just a program.

            well duh. But why is Mozilla investing in LLM research then?

            • nesc@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Firefox translate isn’t an llm afaik. Anyway, why wouldn’t they? LLMs aren’t inherently good or bad, they are useful, and pushing for offline local first ai is a good thing.

              • macniel@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                is the LLM or its trainingdata opensource though, do we know what it does/is trained on?

                • nesc@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  There are truly open llm, there are somewhat open. If you are asking about firefox translate, it seems that models themselves weren’t trained by mozilla.

    • Geometrinen_Gepardi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      How does having an AI-chat feature in a browser diminish it’s quality? No one’s forced to use any feature.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Where does I say that it diminish it’s quality?

        Also the you don’t have to use it, is a weak argument not even for or against it.

        • Deestan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Also the you don’t have to use it, is a weak argument not even for or against

          “Our pizza now comes with a topping of human feces!”

          “Ew”

          “What? Just scrape it off if you don’t like it”