• RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, it probably wouldn’t have happened in the first place, because the driver of a sensibly-sized car can see things that are less than fifty fucking feet ahead of the dash.

    Monstrous behemoths like this should be prohibitively expensive to own for personal use and/or be restricted to industrial/ag use only. Fuck your camping or hauling one chair or whatever the fuck you do twice a year. You can rent for something that seldom.

    • M0oP0o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They are last time I checked “prohibitively expensive” but people are dumb enough to pay $100k over 8 year financing. These things are also no better for “industrial/ag” then a truck from 30 years ago that was 4 feet less tall, had an 8 foot bed and a similar towing capacity at a fraction of the price.

      These things are the crystallization of our hubris.

      • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Part of “prohibitively expensive” would mean that such financing arrangements would not be legal.

    • grue@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, it probably wouldn’t have happened in the first place, because the driver of a sensibly-sized car can see things that are less than fifty fucking feet ahead of the dash.

      [X] doubt

      If big trucks were banned, muderous MAGA psychopaths would just mow down cyclists using Dodge Chargers or whatever instead.