• N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That isnt a great defense against malware “imho”. Security through assuming the threat actor is lazy is just not security. It doesnt take like any effort on their part to just use some off-the-shelf OS fingerprinting code. It isnt worth it either because it contributes to your overall fingerprint, since normal RFP users have a standardized useragent for Windows and Linux separately.

    • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Security is layers, i utilize apparmor and firejail personally. And in fact 90% of widespread malware specifically relies on lazy people. Often targets default passwords etc

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That isnt a great defense against malware

      Nobody said it was a great defense.

      • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It really isnt any defense. All a website can do is initiate a download, websites are sandboxed by default. You still have to run the executable, which doesnt really apply to Linux because the file will have no executable permission.