• Olap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    The guidelines read like Scotch to me. Why not let England have Whiskey? The welsh do, Japanese do, Americans do. Let’s see if their shite water is up to it!

  • ladel@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I read a BBC article that the Scottish Whiskey people aren’t happy that English whiskey would have a more relaxed definition of what can be called single malt whiskey, diluting the “single malt” term. I don’t see much problem with it being a protected term, but is there really anyone out there trying to pass off non-English whiskey as English?

    • MrScaraboosh@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes. There have been a couple a bottlings that were a blend of cheap Scotch and Irish passed off as English. Not common, but it will prevent running into problems like the Japanese have where most of their ‘japanese whisky’ was actually Scotch.

      The definition of single malt is consistant with everywhere else in the world (including Wales) except Scotland. The SWA are upset because England will allow mashing at a local a brewery instead of being at the distillery. They say the whisky loses it ‘sense of place’ - except scottish distilleries buy their grain from Canada and Poland and mature almost everything in a huge warehouse outside Glasgow -hypocrites!. At least the English GI unsists on UK grain!

    • snaprails @feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      There are no Scottish whiskey people. You might be thinking of a different island nearby 😉