Attorney, journalist, and Elon Musk biographer Seth Abramson eviscerated both Elon Musk and his “fanboys” who have attempted to use the billionaire’s IQ as an indication of his intellectual prowess in a series of messages shared on X Thursday evening and into Friday.

  • Lorindól
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Are you familiar with the concept of “projection” in psychology?

    • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I have never claimed a 140 IQ, nor have I unjustly claimed to of a profession I am not! I am not the one trying to compensate for something here?

      But can you answer that one question for me? Pretty please?

      • Lorindól
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I have not claimed any profession.

        In my original comment I did state that I got into officer training, perhaps you assumed that as a career officer? I admit that the conscript army system is so profoundly different that I could have been more precise.

        I assumed that the later mention of university studies would have made it clear that I was not a career soldier.

        It is also true that I cannot verify my claim about the IQ test. Like I said earlier, it was a part of another student’s thesis. We got to hear the results after the test, then the gathered data was processed anonymously. If I recall correctly, the study was more about the qualities of the test itself, the qualities of the participants were not important. I think everyone got a free movie ticket for taking the test and I spent mine on “Kill Bill” 1 or 2.

        But tell me, why would I want to lie about this? To what gain?

        • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Still no country huh? You fear any and all verifiability… I wonder and wonder and wonder why

          Its rllly more that you can’t since it did not happen! I could ask about the parameters of your non-existentent experiment, question its purpose, which you have not stated or its validity, as you said they were made by one of your fellow university students assuming that too wasn’t a lie, which it likely is considering your knowledge of IQ tests… But whats the point? You will posthumously edit yourself out of your contradictions or simply ignore them… I will probably miss the time I wasted on you

          You should ask yourself! Why are you lying on the internet? You know, you can imagine ‘what if’-s without commenting them?