• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yeah, I’ve been tempted to try this route, but you’re really pigeonholing yourself. Even if there’s always wrk, I can’t imagine only working with cobol the rest of my career.

    Even worse, the places still using this are very heavy in process, with many undocumented dependencies among many undocumented workflows and business processes. Modernizing COBOL is not a coding problem: it’s a mammoth project management, coordination, and paperwork project that also has a little bit of coding. And its not like you can write clean code, you need to write essentially the same tangled mess of accumulated changes over decades because there’s no way of knowing everything that might break

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I hereby nominate you to be the new head of the SSA.

      You get it, exactly.

      COBOL itself is a fairly minor part of the problem, the real problem is the retiring COBOL coders are the only ones with enough institutional knowledge, broad and specific, to keep the engine from grenading and fucking wheels from coming off the car when it hits a bad enough pothole.

      But management and C Suite are apparently homo superior, fully confident that none of that really matters, they’ll just keep throwing money at it until its fixed, and failing that, laying off everyone, who care in the end, they get a golden parachute when it all burns, everyone else can FOAD.