I remember asking once, we don’t we just shoot our surplus trash off into the sun and was told that by the cost of launching it outweighs the benefits. Fair!

But what about all of the old satellites and space stations? Why don’t we just send a giant magnet around the earth once or twice and then slingshot all that space junk into the sun and thus giving all science fiction writers (when they return from their strike) a plot point they can no longer use in their film scripts?

Seriously though, without the cost of breaching the atmosphere, this seems really cheap to pull, why don’t we do this? Why isn’t this a standard thing?

  • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tfOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    But if it could get into the orbit of the sun wouldn’t it still burn up?

    • Chriszz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well this is easily answerable given our planet orbits the sun and doesn’t burn up. Even Pluto which is very far away orbits the sun.

      • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tfOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        How close would we need to get? I mean we sent something to Mercury after all

    • hglman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It already is in orbit of the sun. Getting it to a new orbit of the sun will no more get it to the sun than keeping it on Earth unless you use a lot of energy.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It would still take a lot of energy to get it close enough for it be effected by the sun. It would probably be easier to go further out and get a gravity assist from another planet or one of their moons.