- cross-posted to:
- math@lemmy.ml
- math@mander.xyz
- cross-posted to:
- math@lemmy.ml
- math@mander.xyz
cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/22688165
Random thought on magic squares:
If I view the smallest possible non-trivial magic square
2 7 6 9 5 1 4 3 8
since its rows and diagnoals sum up to
2+5+8 = 2+7+6 = 4+5+6 = 2+9+4 = … = 15
Lets view it as a 3x3 Matrix, its determinant is Δ = -360 . Its inverse:
-37/360 19/180 23/360 17/90 1/45 -13/90 -7/360 -11/180 53/360
note how this is a magic square, rows and diagonals sum up to
1/15
.https://matrix.reshish.com/inverse.php
Now if you are really bored (I can not do this): proof that for any non trivial magic squares the inverse …
- exists (i.e. every non-trivial magic square has an inverse)
- is a magic square.
what about this square, it does not have an inverse
That magic square would be called trivial, since it contains the same entry multiple times.