That sounds like a democrat problem. It sounds like they should have ran a candidate that was actually popular rather than forcing through the disliked senile old man that backed a genocide before switching to his tarnished by proximity understudy. But of course the democrats are not a serious party.
If the choice was get kicked in the balls or get punched in the face I would select neither.
The fact that anyone thinks the two are comparable is why Trump is president again.
That sounds like a democrat problem. It sounds like they should have ran a candidate that was actually popular rather than forcing through the disliked senile old man that backed a genocide before switching to his tarnished by proximity understudy. But of course the democrats are not a serious party.
Who do you suggest?
What if they don’t have a better alternative? Is there a rule against pointing out problems without immediately having a solution?