• Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is it in their best interest not to consume porn?

    I would have guessed that’s where the religious oppression was targeted, whatwith being overly obsessed about peoples’ sexualities.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed, it’s often stated but seldom justified. Religion is far more dangerous than boobs on a screen, we need to protect kids from sexual abuse in church instead

    • whileloop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Watch HealthyGamerGG on YouTube, he’s done a few videos on it. But, in short, depending on the person porn can have a lot of negative effects on the individual, including damaging one’s ability to form and keep relationships.

      It is my opinion that we would all be better off without porn, but it is your right to continue using it if you like.

      The Republicans are absolutely going about this the wrong way. For the record, I’ve told my representatives in government to oppose bills like this. But that doesn’t mean you and I can’t understand where their sentiment is coming from.

      • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This sounds an awful lot like confirmation bias to me, so I went to Google Scholar for about 15 minutes.

        A quick scan of meta-studies seem to indicate that teenagers watching pornography mostly leads to them having slightly more sex, which is well known to be healthy.

        For certain vulnerable groups of individuals (poor social integration, weak familial bonds, high risk seeking, and high aggression) porn seems to exacerbate their traits a bit.

        There’s also very tenuous results pointing to porn in pre-teens, as well as teens with low self esteem and poor social collection getting a skewed perception of sexuality. These are the only groups who have ever been shown to be affected negatively, and only in a single study each, without reproduction. And for the teens it reversed when they gained self esteem.

        Seems we should actually have better sex education for teens so they have the support to talk and explore sexuality in a healthy manner with their peers.

        • Uranium3006@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of the supposed “research” is religious propaganda. They’ve never given up their agenda to hold a monopoly over people’s sex lives and are very angary that it’s slipping away from them. We must resist

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s if you watch porn and don’t have education or proper parenting along side it. If porn is used as the educative tool for the child learning about relationships and sex, sure. It’s a problem. But if it’s just used like it’s meant to be used, I don’t think it’s clear cut. It’s only a problem if a kid is sheltered from learning proper sex education and gender.