• papalonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Someone else already said that Legolas’s involvement was created for the movies, but I will point out that Thranduil, Legolas’s father, is the Elvenking that imprisons them in the book (though he is not given the name Thranduil in “The Hobbit”), and Gimli’s relation to Gloin is also from the books.

    So the meme stands to book lore if changed to, “the son of someone who…”

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Legolas is the Crown Prince (probably). He is generally considered to be uninvolved in his father’s wilder moments but it’s a bit more than just being his son. Son and Heir in a setting that’s big into monarchism.

      I think Tolkien would probably argue that doesn’t make him an instrument of the state, necessarily, but Tolkien also thought anarcho-monarchism wasn’t an oxymoron and refused to tell us about Aragorn’s tax policy.