• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    So, in the federal election without a third party under ranked choice; my options would be 1. Harris, 2. Trump.

    • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Ranked choice voting is designed to reduce the spoiler effect and allow voters to support third-party and independent candidates without fear of “wasting” their vote. While it doesn’t automatically create new parties, it can encourage their growth by making the political system more accessible. By implementing RCV first, the political environment becomes more open to alternative parties gaining traction and competing more fairly over time.

      I’m short, by it’s nature, RCV creates alternatives.

        • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          My bad for not being more clear. I didn’t mean to imply that more parties are automatically a good thing. What I meant is that ranked choice voting actually incentivizes candidates to adopt broader, more inclusive positions that reflect the unique views of voters in their district or state. It encourages collaboration and reduces division because candidates need to appeal beyond their base to win second- and third-choice votes. Just adding a third party alone doesn’t fix anything, but RCV actively reshapes how campaigns are run and how candidates engage with voters. That’s something only RCV can accomplish.