• poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    That is all they claim to store for later retrival*, which is not the same as what they would be able to capture in real-time and hand over to law-enforcement if forced to by a court (and they wouldn’t be able to tell you about it because of a gag-order).

    *However this claim is contradicted by the source-code of their server (which they sometimes publish) which seems to store significantly more and of course this is assuming the code is indeed the same as the one they run on their servers, which is unclear.

    Edit: and their servers run on AWS, so even if Signal itself doesn’t store the IP addresses, Amazon certainly could.

    • Brad Boimler@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Very good and true point well said I agree with you on that good thing I am not important enough for it to be a issue lol or do anything illegal.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Passive data collection is an issue for me even though I am also not important. I do use Signal, but only with my true identity and with a few people I know from real life. When it comes to purely online communities, I compartmentalize my identities.