Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoProblem solved.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square272fedilinkarrow-up1727arrow-down140
arrow-up1687arrow-down1imageProblem solved.lemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square272fedilink
minus-squareramble81@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·1 month agoYou can have islands that belong to countries, why not land locked enclaves! (Yes I under logistics and such)
minus-squareXtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·1 month agoWhat if we just take the empty parts of WY and MT to connect CO?
minus-squarelars@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month ago empty parts of WY and MT is redundant 😊
minus-squarejoostjakob@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 month agoPlenty of countries have those. There’s even exclaves within enclaves.
You can have islands that belong to countries, why not land locked enclaves! (Yes I under logistics and such)
What if we just take the empty parts of WY and MT to connect CO?
is redundant 😊
Plenty of countries have those. There’s even exclaves within enclaves.
The City and the City