• Morgikan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is it theft? Who are they stealing from? It’s a workflow tool, right? So then using Photoshop is also theft.

    • tuoret
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Photoshop wasn’t assembled/trained using art created by uncredited and unpaid artists

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        All artists “train” on, and are influenced by, art created by other uncredited and unpaid artists. Art isn’t created in a vacuum, nothing is.

      • Morgikan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe not, but art students have always trained themselves based on others’ work. Go to any art museum and you’ll see students sketching the works there. How is a machine training itself on existing art different from a human doing the same? Should art students sitting at those exhibits pay a fee to the museum to sketch there?