The Dungeons & Dragons role-playing game franchise says it won’t allow artists to use artificial intelligence technology to draw its cast of sorcerers, druids and other characters and scenery.

  • Madison_rogue@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, that’s great. However this is in regards to material published by Hasbro. Were I an author, I would want to employ an actual illustrator or artist to work on my material that’s published to an audience.

    I believe it’s a good thing that Hasbro has taken this stand; that artists should be employed to illustrate their material.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You said “artists should be employed to illustrate their material” and I was pointing out that allowing AI tools to be used doesn’t interfere with that.

          • fear@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what Hasbro wants, though, and it’s completely within their rights to have this stipulation for artwork that is tied to their brand. You sound offended by their decision, when their decision will likely result in more humans being employed and valued for their human contributions. Seems like a strange thing to have a problem with. No one is saying you can’t make your own personal D&D art with AI tools.

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Of course they can do it. I’m saying that they shouldn’t do it. I’m giving my opinion that they are making a bad decision here. It will result in poorer quality books in the long run because they are needlessly hobbling their artists.

              • fear@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Okay, I get your point now. If all artists had your stance and felt this hobbled them, then I’d understand thinking Hasbro’s decision is wrong. But not every artist agrees with you. This is reminiscent of the argument between digital and physical art, with digital artist’s struggle to be seen as viable against oil painters and other physical media artists. Except digital isn’t any better or worse, they’re simply different mediums. You could argue pros and cons for both types, but in the end everyone is entitled to the medium they prefer. This includes AI assisted artwork. If someone prefers digital art but wants no AI influence, that’s up to them since art is entirely subjective.

                This is a perfectly valid direction for Hasbro to want to take, and they’re the ones who get to make the call. Not every artist feels hobbled by being barred from AI tools, some artists prefer to avoid AI entirely. There are plenty of people who would happily accept these jobs.

                • admiralteal@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There’s also a huge difference between an AI tool and an AI generative model. There’s definitely grey area there, but pretending the background eraser is identical to Stable Diffusion is ludicrous. One of them is used by an artist to gain marginal improvements in quality/workflow, the other has an objective of replacing the artist entirely.

                  • fear@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If they want digital artwork, then it’s safe to say they accept the typical digital tools and brushes, even if some of those could technically be using algorithms some would describe as rudimentary AI. An artist would have to be purposely obtuse not to understand the difference between the clone brush and telling Bing to draw them a dwarf.

          • some_guy@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Like cool story bro do you honestly think people didn’t know what you meant? Or did you just want to get a bit argumentative for attention?

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The person I was responding to said:

              Were I an author, I would want to employ an actual illustrator or artist to work on my material that’s published to an audience. I believe it’s a good thing that Hasbro has taken this stand; that artists should be employed to illustrate their material.

              That has a very clear implication that people who use AI art tools are not “actual illustrators” or “actual artists.” I think this is a position that is very much worth arguing against.

              • some_guy@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                And I said:

                Like cool story bro do you honestly think people didn’t know what you meant? Or did you just want to get a bit argumentative for attention?

                But seems like you already answered the question.

                • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Odd what gets under some peoples’ skin. @some_guy has been following me around downvoting all of my comments everywhere I make them today. Having fun wasting all that time?