“I think it’s time to tell the military-industrial complex they cannot get everything they want,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders. “It’s time to pay attention to the needs of working families.”

  • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Sure. I’m not arguing against UHC or trying to claim that nothing needs to be done. I’m just pointing out that the DoD budget wouldn’t make a dent in this problem.

    BTW you really shouldn’t compare this based on absolute dollars.

    Canada - 233 Billion spent on a population of 40 Million people means $5,850 per capita.

    The UK - 266 Billion spent on a population of 69 Million people means $3,855 per capita.

    The US - 1.05 Trillion (your number) spent on a of population of 346 Million people would be just $3,034 per capita.

    So for about 1/3 of the cost of what the US government pays in healthcare, other governments are able to provide free healthcare to their people.

    1/3rd the cost would be roughly 333,333 Billion and drop the per capita expense to right around $1,000. There’s absolutely no possible way that math works.

    Now if we were take the ENTIRE DoD budget, as in no military expenses at all, and stack it on top of the existing 1.05 Trillion (your number) that would give us 1.95 Trillion and a per capita expense of around $5,635. That’s still not enough to reach Canada’s level of spending.

    The math isn’t mathing here.

    Again, I’m not arguing that something doesn’t need to be done but no matter how you go at this the DoD budget isn’t the problem and even using ALL of it wouldn’t get the job done.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Looks like 135 million are covered by Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIPS. So, about $7,777 per person.

        Fair enough, so how does $7,777 per person end up at the claimed 1/3rd the cost?

        Also if we extend that $7,777 per person cost to 340,000,000 people you get a total of roughly 2.65 Trillion dollars. So even 1.95 Trillion (Medicare/Medicaid/CHIPS + the entire DoD Budget) would still come up nearly a Trillion dollars short.

        Again, the math doesn’t work.

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I didn’t say it did. But trying to extend current costs to figure out the cost of covering everyone doesn’t work either. Costs won’t stay the same.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Unless I’m missing something, you’ve calculated the Medicare/Medicaid spending against the entire US population…

        Yes, isn’t that what Universal Healthcare would do? Most Americans would no longer have private insurance if UHC were enacted and the post I replied too claimed that Medicare/Medicaid budget would fund UHC (and at 1/3rd the cost).

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        yeah… it’s not like people who don’t use govt health services don’t get health services - those costs are still paid by “the country” wether it’s by the government or by its citizens

        • BajaTacos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s not an apples to apples cost comparison if the costs for UK and Canada literally covers everyone and the US calculation covers 1/3 of the population.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            i think we’re agreeing about the quoted statistics

            what i’m saying is that it doesn’t matter whether the government pays for medical costs or the individual pays for medical costs - those are all costs that the country puts towards medical care. if the individual didn’t have to pay them, they’d invest them into their life in other ways

            many people argue this stupid notion that the government doesn’t have the money to pay for healthcare, whilst ignoring the fact that the country as a whole does have the money to pay for healthcare - they’re just spending that money privately. if you redirect that private health insurance money to government, the money is there

    • Bacano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It doesn’t matter what percentage of a budget is what. If a government is corrupt to the point of absurdity, the spending is largely ineffective.

      The tax dollars were captured and the value of what theyre being used for is siphoned by middlemen (insurance in health care, middlemen inflating prices in the military) and as a result the prices in both examples are no longer attached to reality.