• MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    that quarter-billion dollar-plus superyachts, and the VIPs who own and cruise in them, may be vulnerable.

    Then don’t cruise in them but instead sit in a bunker like you deserve or alternatively, don’t be a rich shoddy.

      • plz1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        6 days ago

        “Privacy for me, not for thee” means I, as a non-billionaire, get my privacy back before I give one iota about some billionaire not being able to hide a mistress on his super yacht.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        And the billionaires like Zuckerberg that make a lot of money trying to track you everywhere you go on the internet or with your cellphone factor into that statement where?

        • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          You know they are not all the same person? Nevertheless even Zuckerberg has right to privacy, not to ours, but to his

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            When anyone else has an actual right to privacy I’ll give a shit about Zuckerberg’s – who btw has done more to destroy privacy rights than perhaps any other human being in history – “right to privacy”.

            • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I know who he his 🙄 It doen’t change the fact that equalling all rich people to bad people is counterproductive. And human rights apply to all humans, except if what you mean by the lack of privacy ls that he should go to prision, to which I agree

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Except the right to privacy isn’t an enshrined human right at all and this particular asshole would lobby government to make sure that any effort to make it one would fall flat.