cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22892955

The Prius Prime is a dual fuel vehicle, able to run 100% on Electric, or 100% on gasoline, or a computerized blend in-between. This presents me a great opportunity to be able to do a direct comparison with the same car of an EV engine vs an ICE engine.

  • Toyota computer claims 3.2mi-per-kwhr.

  • Kill-a-watt (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kill_A_Watt) claims 2.2mi-per-kwhr.

  • Additional 1.5% losses should be assumed in the wires if you wish. (120V drops down to 118V during charging, meaning 2V of the energy was lost due to the resistance of my home’s wires).

  • Level 1 charger at home (known to be less efficient).

  • Toyota computer claims 53miles-per-gallon (American Gallon).

  • I have not independently verified the gallon usage of my car.

  • 295 miles driven total, sometimes EV, sometimes Gasoline, sometimes both.

  • 30F to 40F (-1C to 4.5C) in my area this past week.

  • Winter-blend fuel.

  • 12.5miles per $electricity-dollar (17.1c / kw-hr home charging costs)

  • 17.1 miles per $gasoline-dollar ($3.10 per gallon last fillup).

If anyone has questions about my tests. The main takeaway is that L1 charging is so low in efficiency that gasoline in my area is cheaper than electricity. Obviously the price of gasoline and electricity varies significantly area-to-area, so feel free to use my numbers to calculate / simulate the costs in your area.

There is also substantial losses of efficiency due to cold weather, that is well acknowledged by the EV community. The Prius Prime (and most other EVs) will turn on a heater to keep the battery conditioned in the winter, spending precious electricity on battery-conditioning rather than miles. Gasoline engines do not have this problem and remain as efficient in the winter.


I originally wrote this post for /c/cars, but I feel like EVs come up often enough here on /c/technology that maybe you all would be interested in my tests as well.

  • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Again. They aren’t baseless. He has rightfully stated that the data you based your whole post on is likely wrong. Meaning your conclusion is likely wrong. You aren’t able to address this as you say you are too busy to carry out the test.

    You want them to take it back. Do so.e research, and prove them wrong. Otherwise, stop shouting.

    All due respect my dude. Have a good day. Dont let this ruin it ( im sure it wont)

    • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You want them to take it back. Do so.e research, and prove them wrong. Otherwise, stop shouting.

      BTW: Seriously, you seem naive to me so let me give you a serious protip.

      If someone thinks you are biased on the internet, and you owe them nothing (not like a close friend or a family or something), you STOP TALKING WITH THEM BECAUSE ITS A WASTE OF TIME. And I’ve found that shouting, and direct insults, is the fastest way to make it clear that I’m ending the discussion.

      Again: don’t waste your time trying to prove yourself against baseless accusations on internet. Its not worth the hassle. If you find yourself doing that, you are the one who will get stressed out in the long term.

      So I reject your advice and instead replace it with the exact opposite. Get angry. Shout, end the discussion. Then move on with your life. The discussion has been blown up, so its easier to move on. Don’t lol “do research” on behalf of other people who don’t give two shits about you and drag on the unnecessary discussion for days. They never were going to believe you anyway, because they thought you were biased from the start.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Take your arrogance and shove it up your butt mate.

        You can say its baseless as much as you want. It wont make it true. They called you out. You didnt like it. And like a little baby you cried and kicked off on them.

        Like i said in my response to your other reply. The real world mpg is closer to 30-42mpg on pure fuel according to research i have done.

        So your numbers are duff. And so is your attitude.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You know what would solve all of this?

      I have an alternative plan. How about YOU run a 200 mile test? Go rent a Prius or borrow one from a friend. Drive it 200 miles in the 30F winter cold and tell me how many gallons were used.

      I’ll wait. A day, a week, a month, a year. Go put your actions where your mouth is.

      Oh, you won’t do it? What about the other guy? Uh huh. You expect me to do it?

      Well there’s the rub, ain’t it? I guess I just accept that I’m biased then.

      He has rightfully stated that the data you based your whole post on is likely wrong.

      With what evidence? Please, I seem to have missed it.

      • davidagain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I guess I just accept that I’m biased then.

        The funny thing is that you really don’t think that you are, and that it’s just all the nasty EV drivers out to dupe you that their running costs were lower and you seem to think that everyone is lying and dishonest except you.

        It doesn’t seem to occur to you that your electric costs are higher and your gas costs are lower than some people.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I dont own a prius prime. Bit more difficult for me to test it. However after some research i can see many people claim on pure fuel they see mpg ranging for 30-42 mpg.

        Only when combined with electric do they see 50mpg and above.

        So based on this i would say your numbers are wrong.

        • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          And this guy in this thread says his Prius gets 45mpg to 63mpg, depending on conditions: https://lemmy.world/comment/13866193

          Oh wait, my numbers say 53mpg. American gallons and American miles.

          Now unless you have done a test yourself, bugger the fuck off. I’m not interested in Internet rumors, I’m interested in the Truth. I don’t know how the fuck your numbers are so far away from reality but that’s your problem.

          The fact remains that I have hard numbers and have run the tests. You haven’t.

          • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            You haven’t run fuel tests. That was the whole point of the argument.

            Ok soni saw 30 to 42 you saw 45 to 63

            Lets take an average with the numbers we have.

            30 +42+45+63=180

            180÷4=45

            So 45mpg… less that what you used to calculate your costs.

            Dont tell me to bugger off because i haven’t done tests when you have also done no tests on fuel.

            I know somethi g that will piss you off.

            I drive an electric car.

            It costs me 7p (about 9 cents) per kwh to charge.

            It cost me £11.68 (about $14.89) to charge last month and i get about 3-4 miles per kwh.

            I travelled 487 miles last month from the 1st to the 30th.

            It cost me 2.4 pence (about 3 cents) per mile to drive this car.

            American miles are the same as british miles

            And i pulled the mpg data from american sources so your gallons are the same.

            So despite your findings, my electic car costs less than your hybrid to run.

            But i doubt your data is accurate, so thats fine.

            • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I know somethig that will piss you off.

              Wow. And you call me arrogant.

              You haven’t run fuel tests. That was the whole point of the argument.

              Toyota claims 48mpg. I claim 53mpg. My test has different results than Toyota’s claims. The entire basis of you (and the other guy’s) posts is mistaken from the beginning. And now you add bullshit numbers from unlisted sources despite two Prius owners in this topic telling you our statistics. And yet, I’m the arrogant and biased one. That’s… interesting.

              Do you understand your position in this matter? I’m the one with the car. I can literally run the complete test when I want. And finally, I’ve shared my initial test results of 53mpg on a much smaller scale (mostly because its now 50F and I’m now unable to do cold weather tests. And the weatherman says I won’t have a near-freezing day for another week or two). Furthermore, it would take a substantial amount (ie: 200 miles of driving) to get a reasonable test done… assuming we want something like ~4 gallons averaged out on the test to help mitigate any errors.

              But if you don’t like the initial numbers I’ve given you (53mpg), that’s not a fault of mine or methodology or whatever. I’m simply showing you my best estimate of reality here. And since YOU admit you don’t own this car, I’m not sure what the fuck you could possibly contribute to the discussion (nor the other guy for that matter).

              • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Yes, you are arrogant.

                You admitted to not running the test. Toyota dont claim 48. They claim 52. Unless you have the XSE or XSE premium model and not the SE.

                If you are getting better stats than the manufacturer, then something is wrong with your test because they get those numbers in absolute perfect conditions and with very specific settings in the car, allowing them to maximise the mpg.

                Yes, you are biased. You are reporting higher stats on the fuel and lower stats on the electric than toyota report. And you got and still are super pissy that people are arguing with you about it.

                I understand my position. I dont own the car, so i have done research and looked at toyata reported stats as well as real owners stats and aggregated the results to come to a conclusion. That is more reliable than one persons individual experience. Especially when that one person hasnt done enough fuel only testing (which you stated plain as day) but wants to draw a conclusion from that.

                Do you understand your position here? You haven’t done enough testing and are posting information to help other buyers make a choice about a purchase. It’s not enough data and may be wrong. So you are potentially causing others to make a poor decision on car purchase.

                It absolutely is the fault of your methodology. Your method was to rigorously test the electric but use toyotas claimed stats for fuel. That’s the method you used to test each engine. That’s poor methodology. Using the manufacturers’ stats is closer to hearsay than you might want to admit.

                You also bring up the weather conditions again. IT IS LITERALLY IN YOUR ORIGINAL POST where you say that the combustion engines are not affected by weather conditions. So do the fucking test!

                Frankly, i can contribute as much as you since we both havent tested the fuel only capabilities of thos car. frankly i think you are a little man child who cant take a lick of critisism and would rather resort to insults than accept when you are wrong. Frankly i think you need to stop being aggressive towards me and the other poster and go and drive you car to get some actual stats.

                • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Unless you have the XSE or XSE premium model and not the SE.

                  You don’t even know what trim I have. This discussion is a waste of time.

                  You are reporting higher stats on the fuel and lower stats on the electric than toyota report.

                  Welcome to ICE cars dude.

                  https://pressroom.toyota.com/toyota-prius-sets-guinness-world-record-for-highest-mpg-for-a-coast-to-coast-drive/

                  Earlier this summer, Gerdes drove from Los Angeles City Hall all the way to New York City Hall in a Prius LE and achieved a staggering fuel economy average for the entire trip of 93.158 MPG combined. This smashed the previous record which was in the mid-70s MPG combined.

                  The actual 'perfect efficiency’s Prius driving is 93MPG right now. Seeing 53 MPG practical is kinda normal for this car.

                  Now if you haven’t driven this car yet, you can go bigger off. I’ve got initial stats suggesting 53MPG.

                  • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    You haven’t said what trim you have… so no… of course, i dont… wow.

                    You ha e quoted a combined mpg when we are discussing the fuel only mpg. so that is actually useless…

                    And once more… you have not driven this car on pure fuel so you and i are in the exact same position… you owning the car doesnt change that… at all.

                    Sheesh. Listen to yourself. Instead of kicking off about stats you dont have and insulting people how about you look at your attitude and your reported stats and consider drawing appropriate conclusions.

                    You cant use your own personal tests with electric and toyata testing with fuel and compare them in your conclusion. Those are two separate sources of data.

                    Stop ignoring this i have said it so many times.

                    It doesnt stop being true because you dont want to acknowledge it…

          • davidagain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The fact remains that I have hard numbers and have run the tests.

            No, you didn’t run any gas tests, you just quoted Toyotas figures, and your data set for electricity is rather small.

            My running costs are from years of actual electricity charges, not some home electricity kit, and I saved about 80% over my petrol car running costs, even before the cheaper servicing and better value retention.