They’d also have to ask for consent before selling your info.

  • actually@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    24 days ago

    Are the agencies that will cease to exist soon just trying to troll people now?

    Or is this a shout for help saying they actually can do new and innovative protections, if only they are not disbanded?

    This ssn protection has been years denied.

      • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        As an ID number it has almost nothing to recommended it, especially compared to modern equivalents in Europe. It wasn’t meant to be a national ID number.

        The only reason we use it for identification in the US is that a common ID is often useful but Americans have always been phobic to mandatory census.

        Obviously they’re fine handling all that information to data brokers, however.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    24 days ago

    But some government agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the FBI also rely on data brokers to get around surveillance restrictions.

    Well, exclude those agencies. Obviously.

    The best time protect personal data was 20 years ago. Why is someone just now thinking of this?

  • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 days ago

    With all the breaches over the years and exposures to malicious employees, hasn’t everybody’s SS # become of part public record? I wouldn’t want it used as a security thing.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    … unless they make an appropriate contribution to the right politician or party.