Just look at that. This truck is taller than a used kid (10 years old). I assume the truck can run over pretty much any other age but probably the driver might be able to see older kid’s heads. Or we could teach our kids to jump to school rather than walk. If you see a truck, jump and make eye contact before jumping while crossing the street. Or we could tell our kids to never go outside until they are 21.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh you mean the new kid regulations requiring stilts and helmets to bring your kids outside? We probably also need new construction regulations to required bollards along the side of the property facing the street so as to prevent damage to trucks if the house happens to get too close.

    • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This one.

      There’s a link to the proposed rule in the first paragraph. Note the diagrams on page 35, page 51, then page 84. They’re working on it. NHTSA is slow, and they won’t be allowed to finish.

      You can comment here if you’d like to actually do something besides be snarky on a website nobody reads.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        In other news, NHTSA with the help of major manufacturers has determined the typical height of a ten year old is eight feet tall. Personal vehicles will be mandated to be able to see people of this height over the hood

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No stilts and helmets, that would be silly. The regulations require jumping up and down like a frog to stay visible, but also you’re entirely responsible to crossy the road while cars and trucks continue at speed

    • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably going to require front-facing camera. Similar to how they dealt with the rear visibility issue.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        IE one more screen based thing to distract from the fact that other humans exist.

        Rear cameras make sense and help people who might no be tall enough or flexible enough to twist and look out the rear window.

        But the front camera will be a distraction from lying proper attention while driving forward.

        We need more vans really, but consumers (who can afford the fucking things) are too insecure to drive anything that might make their wieners look small.