• Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Why is she hunched over the thing in an awkward position? Why not simply hold the mouthpiece in your hand like you’re supposed to?

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Once the hookah is lit, they hold little panels with a note based on how well she did. The note count towards her global performance evaluation.

    • cleanandsunny@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      In a word: orientalism. This art movement was predicated on the exoticism and “othering” of subject matter and the bystanders serve as a proxy for the audience of the art itself.

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Orientalism wasn’t an art movement, the picture is in “academic” style.

        IMO your interpretation can be put in a more straightforward/blunt way: the painting is basically pornography built upon cheap cultural stereotypes. (And it really is bizarre that this sort of garbage art gets upvoted to much, simply because it has an air of refinement around itself that excuses its clearly pornographic character.)

  • TGhost [She/Her]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    “Description: Erroneous visions of the Eastern/oriental woman, historically seen only as a sexual object by the white man”

      • TGhost [She/Her]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        In the orientalism movement, lead by Europeans, wich this art is from, yes.
        Sorry for you, I do not make the history.

        If you are unease with arts and the story behinds, don’t go to museums…

  • TehBamski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Can we get a NSFW tag for these please? I don’t want people thinking that I jackoff to 1800s oil paintings of naked women.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the train and when I saw this I had to start furiously masterbating. Everyone else gave me strange looks and were saying things like “what the fuck” and “call the police”. I dropped my phone and everyone around me saw this image. Now there is a whole train of men masterbating together at this one image. This is all your fault, you could have prevented this if you had just tagged this post NSFW.

      • tetris11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If you’re cis white male, this behaviour is severely frowned upon. The police will just ask you all to do better, and then arrest the brown guy for watching a muckbang vid

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Pornography is not suddenly a great and important piece of culture just because it was nicely painted with a brush a long time ago. It is still pornography.

        What do you mean by “getting some culture”? You mean perhaps studying art history? Because I guarantee countless artists, art historians and critics would deny this painting has much cultural value. The whole style has been heavily and justifiably derired. If anything, what is conservative here is the painting’s view of women (painted according to the sexual tastes of rich European men) and stereotypical treatment of foreign culture.