Bluesky managed to go offline practically entirely. I count on you folks to spork the hell out of this.

See also here.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah because decentralization is just a gimmick. It sounds cool on paper, but in reality it doesn’t solve many problems - it just introduces many others. The only situation where it helps is if an instance goes down permanently, and even then it’s not that helpful.

      • kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Decentralization greatly decreases vendor lock-in, lessens the damage of a single actor and adds competition. These are serious long-term benefits for a service and its users.

        There’s a reason why something like email is still around and being innovated on 40 years later, while its proprietary competitors are long since dead. And it’s not that the technology is very good.

        Bluesky is just another ICQ/AIM/Slashdot/Digg, a little walled garden that will eventually be ran into the ground. Which is fine. The issue is that it’s trying to embrace and extinguish the fediverse by pretending to be decentralized.

        • joulethief@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          There’s a reason why something like email is still around and being innovated on 40 years later, while its proprietary competitors are long since dead.

          Can you tell me more about those competitors? I did a quick google search but could not find anything tangible