• mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Are “fat bikes” the over powered electric motorcycles? 'Cause we got problems with those in the United States, too.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.luOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 days ago

      From the article:

      The article mentions “SUV-ization” of the bycicle.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 days ago

        the ‘form factor’ isn’t the problem. a ‘cool’ tricked-out bike could just be cosmetics, tire size and suspension; and still have a legally allowed motor output and a safe rider.

        it’s the modifications to bypass power limits (some can go 60+ km/h, where the legal limit is closer to 25) or swap out motors for much stronger ones, and how reckless some people ride.

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        the difference is that’s objectively cool whereas there’s nothing cool about an SUV

        • oce 🐆@jlai.luOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          What makes you think the reasons you think this is cool is different from the reasons why other people find SUV cool? This article mentions the similarities.

          • oo1@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Just add 2 more wheels and a big bumper front and back, maybe a passenger seat or two and a trailer behind it, enclose it in a weatherproofing shell then it’d be cooler.

            /s

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Technically no, but people are really confused with terminology around electric bikes of all sorts. Fatbikes are just a bicycle with oversized tires. When we look at mountainbike tires, they typically stop at around 2.6, maybe 2.8 inches in width. Fatbikes are more around 3.8 or even more, and are typically intended for snowy areas, or if you just want the extra cushioning off road. What people nowadays cry about and describe as “fatbike” is more of an electric moped.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Fat bikes are bikes with wide tires. The wide tire acts as a sort of suspension in effects. They’re fun as hell especially when you hit potholes, but idk why people are using them on streets for transport, they’re far more of a fun bike

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Oh that’s stupid. I’ve ridden a non assisted fat bike once and loved it, but it really is a toy bike. You’re far better off with a road bike that has some shocks if you aren’t using it for shit like dune riding or something like that.

          I’m not saying every bike should be ultra focused on the custom stuff. I grocery shop with a gravel bike, but different bike styles exist for a reason

    • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Fatbikes look cool but lose one of the main advantages of bicycles, which is that you can easily carry them, whether up stairs, onto a train or into a car. Electric fatbikes must be even worse for that. Its probably better thinking of them as motorbikes.

      • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        As a comparison, the Aventon Level.2 is their city commuter ebike. Stock, it weighs 62 lbs (28 kg). Nobody is carrying that bike up stairs, and it’s not a fatbike.

        The problem here is people exceeding speed limits in populated places, creating danger.

      • intelisense@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I thought these things were a bit dumb, then I figured out that the fatter tires make riding on the cobble stones that are common in my city more comfortable. I still don’t want one, but I see that they have their place.

        • DV8@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          No getting your wheels stuck in tram tracks either. Not relevant everywhere ofcourse but in places where they have trams plenty of people fall and get injured because of tram tracks.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Only if you also reduce the air pressure, which comes with its own drawbacks. This is mountainbike 101 basically.