• Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    1 year ago

    vs The Expanse: we are headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense but humanity’s salvation will come from… Nevermind, we’re fucked.

      • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Truly ? What aspects of it ?

        I mean they do have universal basic income on earth but apart from that humanity is all kinds of fucked. And it doesn’t exactly get better as the story progresses.

        • AlexisFR@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          The fact that the earth is even united and not completely screwed is already a great start. It was even recovering from climate change before Inaros.

          • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            The earthers are not doing that bad in the beginning that is true. But the rest of the system have it rough.

          • teft@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            The earth is united like the United States is united. The tribes just got bigger is all. Instead of NATO vs BRICS, the Expanse universe has Earthers vs Martians vs Belters. And people are suffering hard on earth as evidenced during Bobby’s trip to the ocean.

            • busteray@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Bobby’s saw a very different earth in the books tho.

              People living in UBI weren’t really living a paradise but they weren’t homeless hobos like in the show.

              • teft@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Example B of earth being shittastic is the entirety of The Churn novella

                The story for The Churn is entirely Earth based and provides a description of what the average life in a crowded, metropolitan city is like in the world of the Expanse. The city of Baltimore has given way to a multitude of crime bosses, and organized black markets. There are multiple bosses who each keep a “family” of personal guards that operate the smuggling of goods, illegal memory implants, weapons smuggling, cybernetic implants, and other illegal goods and services. The story takes place over the course of about two days.

          • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mostly they suffer from extreme boredom and mediocre lives. Nothing drastic but soul suckingly unfulfilling.

        • AlexisFR@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not at all. It always looked like something in between for me. Humanity is still struggling but moving forward, and most people live under various kind of regimes but no big bad Empire.

          • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well the belters have it pretty rough and Mars is basically totalitarian. And without spoiling anything I’d suggest you keep reading, it is worth it :).

            • Krompus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have a question for you, fancy pantsy book reader on their own instance: should I watch the show and then read the books, read the books and then watch the show, or read the books and skip the show?

              • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well my pants aren’t fancy at all thank you very much :p.

                The show is great, and so are the books. Mostly I would start by watching the show which is, for the first season at least, much more polished imho (the writers of the book were also show runners). After that, the show ends at book 6 (there are 9 total) but several character arcs are tweaked so I would recommend reading at least books 3 to 6 before 7.

              • bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Watch the show and then read the books. In my opinion the show is fantastic and incredibly enjoyable (except for ending the series in what is obviously the middle of a significant plot thread, which is annoying) but the books are even better and spoiled the show a tinsy bit for me.

          • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            As far as I know utopia and dystopia are like polar opposites. I have never heard the take before that the concept of utopia includes that it´s rotten on the inside and only looks perfect. Where did you get that idea from?

            A utopia (/juːˈtoʊpiə/ yoo-TOH-pee-ə) typically describes an imaginary community or society that possesses highly desirable or near-perfect qualities for its members.

            and

            The opposite of a utopia is a dystopia.

            source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utopia

    • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This idea is oddly fascinating. Now we just need a good sci-fi writer to produce the “missing link”.

      • swab148@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe the robots in Asimov’s universe lead to the creation of Erasmus and eventually the Butlerian Jihad.

        • bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ffs the main power of their space witches is to use a sexy voice. Which everyone knows about! Just put in earplugs or jerk off prior or get gay guys or use deaf people or get straight women before dealing with one.

          Not only is there nothing in any the books to even suggest that this is the mechanism by which the Voice works, there is a very prominent scene where the main male character uses the Voice to compel other male characters to do his bidding.

          (In fact, in the later books a “corrupt” version of the Bene Gesserit shows up that does explicitly use their sexuality as the source of their manipulation power, and the Bene Gesserit find this absolutely abhorrent.)

          • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lord, please deliver us from people with really “clever” hot takes that are horribly reductive and strained through the mesh of whatever synonym for “woke” won’t get me downvoted.

        • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          After reading your (imo totally idiotic) thoughts about my beloved Dune, I simply wish to never talk to you again. Bye bye!

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the non-canon book Psychohistorical Crisis, the Dune universe is part of the past of the Foundation universe. The Fremon are known as the “Frightful People” to historians.

  • roofuskit@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll let you all guess which one was published in the 50s and which one was published in the 60s.

  • blurr11@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both of these are terrible takes on the books.

    Spice is not a solution in dune in fact the whole 4th book and the end of the third are centered around forcing humanity to wean itself off spice so that it may evolve.

    The central concept is that humanity must not depend on machine or drugs or complicated eugenics and must instead look inwards and improve itself by facing hardship.

    In foundation (at least the start) the complicated maths is essentially there to prove that all establishments fail and survival requires constant change. Very differently from dune foundation sees technological superiority as key to this and importantly the ability for society to change in order to support the technological progress.

    Even if you don’t agree with the above neither book aims to “fight imperialist bullshit” if anything they both quite staunchly support the idea of a benevolent dictator controlling all.

    • TheUnicornOfPerfidy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Or is Dune about the folly of different types of dictatorship; sadistic, benevolent, religious or machiavellian? Taking only the first book (because that’s as far as I’ve read) every leader is thwarted or confined by the consequences or weakness of their own style of leadership.

      • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        I read an interview where frank said that his intention was for Dune to be a cautionary tale about the dangers of charismatic leaders (which is to say, the “classic” hero archetype). Which - for the first book - tracks pretty well. The free are basically just used as cannon fodder for Paul to win back his power (and a lot more), then when he wins, he sets them loose on the universe because he can’t control them.

        The trouble I have with that though is that he goes on to contradict that point in later books, but I won’t get into that because I don’t want to spoil anything for you

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s honestly crazy how many people can read Dune and completely misunderstand the themes of the book.

      Though to be fair, it sometimes feels like Frank himself didn’t fully understand what themes he was going for. Books 1-3 were staunchly “Beware of heroes, charismatic leaders will lead you to evil and despair”, then in GEoD, we find that literally the only hope for humanity was millenia of oppression by a totalitarian government.

      But either of those two takes is still wildly better than “spice saves the universe” lol

      • Koffiato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dune has one of the most complex (and necessarily logical) universe in it. I’m not surprised every reader found different themes more fitting.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Dune had no good guys, none at all.

          Everyone was out for themselves or their narrow view of what was just and best for humanity from their simplistic and self-centered perspective.

          Leto 2 was the exception because he was out for his narrow view of what was best for humanity from his broad, self-centered perspective that still didn’t really lead anywhere.

          The actual point of the books is that no ideal survives the test of real time, and over time civilization tends to ossify, so we are doomed to catastrophe by our very nature.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It wasn’t the qctual only hope, just the only path Paul and Leto could see, and we know they aren’t omniscient

  • spacesweedkid27 @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think Dune has very many themes, but the biggest one is the dangers of religion (which is not really portrayed in the movie I think)

    • ThreeHalflings@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The 2022 movie covers the first half of the first book and that theme only really comes into its own in books 2 and 3.

      • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, I feel like manipulating a whole culture’s established religious beliefs to place themself at the highest seat of power and war a holy war in their name is a pretty poignant display of “religion bad, m’kay”

        • crypticthree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but if you don’t know about the books it doesn’t necessarily look like manipulation. That’s only made overt when you read the latter books

          • 6daemonbag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My partner never read the books and easily caught the massive religious manipulation angle through the film. The even more massive scale of it all was obviously not revealed because of when it takes place, but it’s still present

            • pips@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Helps that it’s outright stated near the beginning of the movie.

          • TheActualDevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you haven’t read the books the movie makes no sense. It’s nothing but a string of half-ass book references and pretty scenery. Even having read the books the movie was still all over the place. It was a string of individual scenes with barely anything to connect them besides having the same characters.

            And since I’m finally venting about it, if they were going to just focus on visuals, they could have at least gotten the scale right. They have these giant buildings and ships alluding to a mass of people keeping it operational. Then we never see more than like, 6 people. And the one scene where they pulled out all of the people at the climax, where it makes sense to show every soldier during an all hands emergency, we see, like, 50 people. They’re supposed to have thousands of soldiers. Losing a dozen soldiers in the book would have been acceptable losses. The movie force we see, that would cripple them.

            Also, it should have ended just after the attack. Use all that extra time to actual get you invested in House Atreides and Paul. In anything really. That movie was so bad. I’ve always like Lynch’s Dune for it’s insanity, but compared to the new one, it’s a legitimately good movie. At least there’s a story.

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        The original movie was good for the art direction and fantastic acting by supporting characters.

        That’s kinda where it ends though, comparing the two of them, the new Dune features human emotion which is pretty cool; all the main characters were kind of animatronic feeling in the old one imo.

        • TheActualDevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But, the book characters were intentionally written to be pretty emotionally flat? The Gom Jabbar scene… Jessica showing emotion doesn’t make it a bad scene, but it kind of undercuts how the Bene Gesserit work. Their whole thing is conquering their emotions and being composed and in control all the time. Jessica’s turmoil is internal while her face is stoic. That’s her whole character at that point in the book. she’s not a very good Bene Gesserit, but she’s faked it real well.

          Except Duncan and Gurney. They should have had personality. That’s Their purpose in the books. To be the ones who show Paul what being a real human is like beyond the Duke (laden with responsibility and the knowledge that his entire house and the thousands of people that rely on it are teetering on a knife’s edge) and Jessica (basically a magic robot concubine who was raised from birth with the sole purpose of furthering a generations long genetic project her captors teachers were working toward). They’re meant to be a breath of fresh air that give Paul the foundation to be a real boy.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, either the internet can’t identify a great joke or… no, I guess the only reasonable explanation is that your comment whooshed over people’s heads.

        • Bizarroland@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s all good, I mean I read both of the books like ages ago and those were the only things that bubbled up out of the scary dark corners of my memory when the opportunity presented itself.

      • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don´t mean that abomination made by Lynch that shits all over the book do you?!?

      • boeman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m still absolutely loving the fact we are on different instances in completely different parts of the world, yet we can still communicate.

          • boeman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, I used that a lot back in the day. It’s just crazy that I’m seeing some real trends of interoperability between services. ActivityPub is a dream come true for me.

            This is so much more than IRC ever was.

  • dnzm@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Iain M. Banks: we’re living in an AI-regulated Utopia, but the AI that we totally trust might be doing some light imperialism on the side.

    Pratchett / Baxter: we’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, and another one, and another one, and another one, and oops, a blank…

    Edit: added the Long Earth one.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Culture stuff is great but nothing tops The Algebraist. A near-perfect standalone sf doorstop imo.

      Big ideas, some laughs, a mystery that you can solve if you’re paying attention, strong characters, interesting aliens…

      The last one that hit that sweet spot for me was Mother of Storms by John Barnes.

      • dnzm@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hadn’t read The Algebraist yet, so there’s a new one on my list. Thanks! I’ll make sure to check out Barnes, too.

  • devil_d0c@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arthur C. Clarke: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from encountering benevolent alien intelligence we haven’t discovered yet.

    Ray Bradbury: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from rediscovering the beauty of books and humanity’s inherent capacity for empathy in a world we’re rapidly forgetting.

    Robert A. Heinlein: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from pioneering individualism, libertarianism, and multi-planetary colonies we haven’t established yet.

    William Gibson: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from navigating and subverting the interplay of high technology and low life in a cybernetic reality we’re only beginning to understand.

    Ursula K. Le Guin: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from understanding and integrating a spectrum of social, psychological, and cultural perspectives we haven’t fully considered yet.

    Neal Stephenson: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from unprecedented technological and social innovation, often resulting from deep historical and philosophical introspection, in a future we’re yet to engineer.

    Octavia Butler: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from embracing and adapting to change through the lens of bio-diversity and sociocultural evolution we haven’t fully embraced yet.

    • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Douglas Adams: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense and humanity will almost completely be erased, but as a matter of fact, there is much more and weirder nonsense out there, which of course makes the previously mentioned nonsense quite nonsensical and thus the destruction of humanity quite unimportant from a galactic point of view. (Where this point is located, has been a debate for aeons.)

    • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gene Roddenberry: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from remotely incubating and uplifting improbably humanoid alien species across vast swaths of existence to shore up our defenses against mysterious adversaries that plot our extinction for reasons they’ve not monologued yet.

      • DaSaw@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That sounds more like post-post-post-Roddenberry Trek.

        Gene Roddenberry: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but don’t worry, it’ll get better.

    • DaSaw@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every fantasy author (except Tolkien): We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from an individual or small group who will save the world through the judicious application of violence.

      • devil_d0c@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gene Wolfe: We’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense, but humanity’s salvation will come from traversing complex, labyrinthine narratives and deciphering symbolic, metaphysical riddles we haven’t begun to understand yet.

  • Bizarroland@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Asimov: weird mutants capable of overthrowing the universe should be put down with prejudice.

    Frank Herbert: weird mutants capable of overthrowing the universe should be made emperor.

  • hansl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    vs Hyperion:

    Dan Simmons: We’re headed for some bleak imperialism nonsense but humanity’s salvation will come from serving AIs we haven’t discovered yet.

    • the_itsb (she/her)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t we eventually find out the AIs are oppressing the humans and siphoning off their life-force/brain-power through the use of the portal system and that humanity’s actual salvation comes from deeply believing in the power of love to the point of developing the ability to teleport to beloved places and people?

      • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        yeah IIRC that power of love thing was the way our fleshbag brains could deal with the same stuff that the AIs interacted with directly

  • CompN12@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Warhammer 40k: we’re headed for some bleak imperial nonsense but BY THE GOD EMPEROR SUCH HERESY IS INTOLERABLE.

  • Murdo Maclachlan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Image Transcription: Mastodon Post


    Peter Cohen, @flargh@mastodon.s…

    “Foundation” vs “Dune”

    Isaac Asimov: we’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense but humanity’s salvation will come from using math we haven’t discovered yet

    Frank Herbert: we’re headed for some bleak imperialist nonsense but humanity’s salvation will come from tripping on drugs we haven’t discovered yet


    I am a human who transcribes posts to improve accessibility on Lemmy. Transcriptions help people who use screen readers or other assistive technology to use the site. For more information, see here.