I know these federated communities exist as well as raddle, but it still seems like most people will stay on toxic and corporate-run platforms like reddit or Twitter. I’m far from perfect myself and I still use reddit sometimes, especially for more niche communities, but when it comes to ideologically strong communities like the anarchist ones, it just feels wrong that the majority still hang out on reddit. Or you know, moving to something like Bsky when Twitter became too toxic but which is still run by a large, for-profit corporation (if they moved in the first place). What are your thoughts? Is there any justification for this?

  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    11·
    3 days ago

    This discussion is getting tiring and fragmented and going nowhere.

    Because it is mostly a series of straw men coming from you at this point and an aversion to replying to what I say instead.

    I will again reiterate that anarchist instances doesn’t mean that the admins always have the time to take the effort to sort them out in the most anarchistic way possible.

    And there’s another! “The most anarchistic way possible”. If only someone here had said that.

    Therefore some decisions will be taken as obvious and done directly to protect the instance members. Many anarchists will consider a tankie-haven like hexbear as valid an instance to block without further discussion as much as exploding-heads.

    You are now telling stories instead of acknowledging it was one admin making a decision with no discussion or feedback, lmao. Just be direct and to the point if you don’t like things to meander or become tiring.

    This is obviously accepted given the lack of outcry by their members.

    That is certainly true! But it does not make it less funny and absurd.

    There’s plenty of ways to handle these decisions and your inability to consider them in favour of trying to goad me with it being “funny”

    Goad you? I said it right off the bat as a one-off observation and it has snowballed because you are not being direct.

    just betrays either immaturity and complete inexperience modding large communities, or that you’re just trolling and I’m inclined to think of the latter.

    Or maybe I just think it is funny and at odds with anarchistic thought.

    The arguments you make in this thread and your insistence about the 20s betrays you as a Marxist-Leninist, but feel free to tell me I’m actually wrong and I would be surprised. Stranger things have happened. However as an ML, you have scant understanding of how anarchists work and therefore it’s impossible to take seriously your moderation suggestions as coming from an anarchist perpective.

    “I expect you to be able to explain this without my input, as you are so certain, right?”

    This is a topic that is entirely your deviation by the way.

    Given that I think you seem to just be trolling to amuse yourself, you are a waste of time to engage with as there’s nothing constructive to be gained by reading you try to goad and gotcha me endlessly.

    I agree that this is a silly conversation, but this is because you leave a pile of inconsistencies and illogic and guesswork and evasion at my feet and say, “here is my counterargument”, and I have to say, “wow look at all this nonsense” and then say exactly what is wrong with it. It is the opposite of trolling, I am trying to take you seriously. You aren’t making it easy.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      1·
      3 days ago

      Yawn. More of the same. MLs claiming they understand anarchism better than anarchists and proceeding to lecture. Your argumentation method is built to be exhausting instead of constructive and I have no mood for it. Goodbye.