SelfProgrammed@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 22 hours agoHow dare you...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down137
arrow-up11.39Karrow-down1imageHow dare you...lemmy.worldSelfProgrammed@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 22 hours agomessage-square153fedilink
minus-squareZeon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down11·6 hours agoWas he actually convicted of that though?
minus-squarebitjunkie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·5 hours agoIt wasn’t a criminal proceeding, but he was found at fault or whatever the civil court equivalent is
minus-squareNateNate60@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·3 hours agoThe civil court equivalent is being adjudged liable.
minus-squareUnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·6 hours agoMy experience whit those folks is that you can’t extrapolate observations to make conclusions about the past. So basically they throw away any inductive reasoning that would be detrimental to their pet belief.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 hours agoOnly a civil case, not a criminal conviction.
Was he actually convicted of that though?
It wasn’t a criminal proceeding, but he was found at fault or whatever the civil court equivalent is
The civil court equivalent is being adjudged liable.
My experience whit those folks is that you can’t extrapolate observations to make conclusions about the past.
So basically they throw away any inductive reasoning that would be detrimental to their pet belief.
Only a civil case, not a criminal conviction.