fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 hours agoAlmost nine gigabytes in size: Windows update 24H2 creates an undeletable cache filewww.digitec.chexternal-linkmessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up1304arrow-down17
arrow-up1297arrow-down1external-linkAlmost nine gigabytes in size: Windows update 24H2 creates an undeletable cache filewww.digitec.chfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 hours agomessage-square81fedilink
minus-squareSynopsisTantilize@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·10 hours agoI’d say they started the misstepping after they “fixed” Vista with windows 7. After that, they tried to hard instead of slow rolling. Windows 10 was good but 11 is just…windows 8 again.
minus-squareItdidnttrickledown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 hours agoWindows ME was the original mistake edition. It was terrible.
minus-squareSynopsisTantilize@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoWell yes. But in more recent times for the examples I was giving
minus-squarechaogomu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·8 hours agoWindows has always had broken versions. The old advice was to always skip every other version. NT, Millennium, Vista, 8… 10… 11… More misses than hits really. And the bad updates are turning hits into misses.
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 hours agoThat list mixes NT kernel OS’s with Win95 OS’s to support a bad hypothesis. The NT line is: NT 3.1, NT 3.51, NT 4, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Vista, 7,8, 10. NT 4, 2000, and XP were all great. Vista was good on good hardware. 7 was good. 8 was bad, 10 good, 11 bad. If you take the 95 path it’s 95 good, 98 good, Me bad. The only pattern is 7 good, 8 bad, 10 good, 11 bad.
minus-squareSynopsisTantilize@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoYea I still follow that advice.
I’d say they started the misstepping after they “fixed” Vista with windows 7. After that, they tried to hard instead of slow rolling. Windows 10 was good but 11 is just…windows 8 again.
Windows ME was the original mistake edition. It was terrible.
Well yes. But in more recent times for the examples I was giving
Windows has always had broken versions. The old advice was to always skip every other version.
NT, Millennium, Vista, 8… 10… 11… More misses than hits really. And the bad updates are turning hits into misses.
That list mixes NT kernel OS’s with Win95 OS’s to support a bad hypothesis.
The NT line is:
NT 3.1, NT 3.51, NT 4, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Vista, 7,8, 10.
NT 4, 2000, and XP were all great. Vista was good on good hardware. 7 was good. 8 was bad, 10 good, 11 bad.
If you take the 95 path it’s 95 good, 98 good, Me bad.
The only pattern is 7 good, 8 bad, 10 good, 11 bad.
Yea I still follow that advice.