• AmbiguousProps@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    170,000 globally, 17,000 laid off. Boeing’s competitor, Airbus, has around 150,000 employees globally, for a comparison (although Airbus doesn’t have US government contracts, as far as I know, which could explain the larger number at Boeing).

    A lot of these people probably have little to do with working directly on aircraft manufacturing is my guess. IT, compliance, accounting, and marketing, to name a few. It just takes a lot to manufacture, sell, and maintain aircraft at this scale I think.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are US govt contracts special that way? Airbus is also a major military supplier, they own Eurofighter and Eurocopter. They also have the FCAS to act as a money pit, and they are apparently the second largest space company in the world as well, they own ArianeSpace among other stuff.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        A lot of Boeing positions require security clearance due to the military contracts, I’m not sure how that works in Europe but I wouldn’t be surprised if they have something similar.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think it’s less standardized, so it’s more of a thorough background check, but I guess it’s similar.

          I once applied to work at NATO and they just wanted a thorough background check.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      And this does not include all the subcontractors, for example the engine is manufactured by other companies like Safran which has around 90,000 employees.