• FizzyOrange@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wow, they (apparently) finally made the REPL not suck! I always thought it was weird how shit it was given that it’s one of the big reasons Python has become as popular as it is.

    Maybe in another 20 years they can make the package tooling not suck too.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah it’s definitely a vast improvement on previous attempts (Poetry et al).

        I dunno if it can be called solved until it’s officially sanctioned and installed by default though, and I don’t see that happening for a very long time.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      poetry has made the package tooling generally not suck for me, and uv seems to be getting better. Just a few more PEPs to go until uv does what I want. Here’s hoping.

    • brettvitaz@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maybe because people who needed it knew there were better ways to do it, like ipython and Jupyter. I’ve never heard of anyone gushing about the stock REPL.

    • solrize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Python REPL was always sort of minimal when used from the command line, but is quite usable in an Emacs window. IDLE is also useful some of the time. I never felt the need for anything like Eclipse because of it.