• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    That assumes that an adversary has control of the browser. The big reason you don’t want to send passwords over https is that some organizations have custom certs setup. It is better to just not send the password at all.

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That assumes that an adversary has control of the browser

      No it doesn’t, if they intercept an encrypted password over HTTPS they can resend the request from their own browser to get access to your account

      The big reason you don’t want to send passwords over https is that some organizations have custom certs setup

      What is the problem with that? The password is secure and only shared between you and the site you are intending to communicate with. Even if you sent an encrypted password, they wrote the client side code used to generate it, so they can revert it back to its plaintext state server side anyways

      It is better to just not send the password at all.

      How would you verify it then?

      If not sending plaintext passwords was best practice then why do no sites follow this? You are literally posting to a site (Lemmy) that sends plaintext passwords in its request bodies to log-in