• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s a really bold claim. Every time a new package manager and/or dependency resolver comes around, we have the exact same headline

    • BitSound@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It is a bold claim, but based on their success with ruff, I’m optimistic that it might pan out.

      • monogram@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        pipx, poetry, pipsi, fades, pae, pactivate, pyenv, virtualenv, pipenv

        Let’s hope this next one will be the true standard.

          • dallen@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I’ve been mostly a poetry guy but have tested out uv a bit lately. Two main advantages I see are being able to install Python (I relied on pyenv before) and it’s waaay faster at solving/installing dependencies.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Yeah, it certainly looks nice, but my problems are:

              • everything runs in a docker container locally, so I don’t think the caching is going to be a huge win
              • we have a half-dozen teams and a dozen repositories or so, across three time zones, so big changes require a fair amount of effort
              • we just got through porting to poetry to split into dependency groups, and going back to not having that is a tough sell

              So for me, it needs to at least have feature parity w/ poetry to seriously consider.