Generative@aussie.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoWhat problems are the AT protocol trying to solve that are not already solved by ActivityPub?message-squaremessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up146arrow-down17
arrow-up139arrow-down1message-squareWhat problems are the AT protocol trying to solve that are not already solved by ActivityPub?Generative@aussie.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squarefraydabsonlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoI feel this explains it well - https://atproto.com/guides/faq
minus-squaresteve228uk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 year agoI have still never bought this reasoning. A far better approach would be to propose an ActivityPub 2.0 as an RFC.
minus-squareMereo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoIn my opinion, as long as it is not an RFC, it will go nowhere.
I feel this explains it well - https://atproto.com/guides/faq
I have still never bought this reasoning. A far better approach would be to propose an ActivityPub 2.0 as an RFC.
In my opinion, as long as it is not an RFC, it will go nowhere.